Anyway, whilst browsing through AudioKarma (who still seem to be closed to new registrations?) I happened to come across this little gem of a post:
"Any well designed system with an 8 inch or larger woofer is capable of bass in the 30 Hz range with proper placement to take advantage of room re-enforcement. No need to complicate and confuse things with another woofer, IMO." - Rybeam, AudioKarma.
Now, I can see where this person is coming from - I have a pair of modified GLL Mezzos (later models, I believe from 1997) which are capable of astounding amounts of bass for a bookshelf speaker, without sacrificing midrange clarity or treble extension. My only real complaint is that they lack dynamics.
Surely, there is a limit to what a pair of smaller cones can do without introducing unreasonable amounts of harmonic and intermodulation distortion, so if you like dynamic (or overly loud) music, why shouldn't you use a subwoofer or two to fill in the bottom end?
Something tells me the quote above is from a person who has only ever heard cheaper bandpass or ported sub designs aimed at turning the bass-shy systems of average consumers into neighbour-annoing nightclub dancefloor systems. You know the sort, 12" driver in a 1cu.ft. ported box and a response of 50-120Hz at best.
Or possibly not? The sheer popularity of the LS3/5a* and its clones tends to make me think that to be a true "Audiophile" you need to have some kind of hatred for deep bass, and for anyone that suggests that being able to feel 25Hz shake the floor is good.
Has bass somehow become an evil power-wasting entity that must be eliminated? Or are more and more people leaving the frequency response to the claimed curve from the manufactutrer, and not thier own SPL meters?
If the former is the case, why? I've been criticised several times for not having a dead-flat bass response throughout my room, but personally I prefer to hear the entire recording and *enjoy* it, rather than spend my entire time wondering if I'm missing out on something in the lower end of the spectrum. I do believe that no bass is better than bad bass, but bad bass is very subjective in itself - I can't stand listening to thumpy subs and wooly midbass (think 60Hz peak and noise rougly resembling music from 90-200Hz), yet other people seem to think this is the way their music is meant to sound (such as anybody willing to buy Bose systems ;-) ).
So... What are people's opinions here?
* I'd like to point out again that this is a nearfield monitor designed with a massive chunk of midrange missing from it's response, for use in mobile studios - the back of a Ford Transit being a common place.